Jens Pohlmann

19 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Jens Pohlmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Internal Medicine 335
  • Hematology 249
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 457
  • Organic Chemistry 457
  • Cancer Research 197
Replace Ali H. Al-Hakim with:
Ali H. Al-Hakim United States
Giuseppe Cassinelli Italy
Sidney D. Lewis United States
Henry W. Pauls United States
Henning W. M. Priepke Germany
William J. Hoekstra United States
Marian Gorecki Israel
Philip E.J. Sanderson United States
Luke N. Robinson United States
Katsu-ichi Sakano Japan
Jens Pohlmann relative to Ali H. Al-Hakim United States Ali H. Al-Hakim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Ali H. Al-Hakim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Pohlmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Pohlmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Pohlmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Pohlmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Pohlmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Pohlmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Pohlmann. The network helps show where Jens Pohlmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jens Pohlmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens Pohlmann Line = papers co-authored together Jens Pohlmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005488
2 2005362
3 2018312
4 2014252
5 2004183
6 200489
7 200465
8 200154
9 200654
10 200443
11
Environmental induction of differentiation-specific keratins in malignant mouse keratinocyte lines.
198634
12 199823
13 19987
14 20045
15 20105
16 19984
17 20232
18 20202
19 20211
20 20230

About Jens Pohlmann

Jens Pohlmann is a scholar working on Microbiology, Cell Biology, Molecular Medicine, Communication and Organic Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (2 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (335 citations), Hematology (249 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (457 citations), Organic Chemistry (457 citations) and Cancer Research (197 citations). Jens Pohlmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth Perzborn, Susanne Roehrig, Thomas F. J. Lampe, Andreas Straub, Andreas Wilmen, Heidi A. Lane, Josef Pernerstorfer, Karl‐Heinz Schlemmer, Alexander Straub and Peter Reinemer. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact