Jens Kreisel

957 citations
9 papers · 835 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jens Kreisel

8 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Jens Kreisel
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 450
  • Materials Chemistry 811
  • Biomedical Engineering 336
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 408
  • Geophysics 74
Replace R. G. Burkovsky with:
R. G. Burkovsky Russia
V. Porokhonskyy Czechia
J. K. Lee United States
Daria Andronikova Russia
Weilie Zhong China
M. Pintard France
Н. В. Зайцева Russia
J. Padilla United States
S. Veljko Czechia
M. A. Malitskaya Russia
Jens Kreisel relative to R. G. Burkovsky Russia R. G. Burkovsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
R. G. Burkovsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Kreisel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Kreisel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Kreisel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Kreisel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Kreisel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Kreisel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Kreisel. The network helps show where Jens Kreisel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jens Kreisel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens Kreisel Line = papers co-authored together Jens Kreisel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013318
2 2003167
3 2005158
4 200289
5 201053
6 200338
7 201110
8 20132
9 20110

About Jens Kreisel

Jens Kreisel is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Geophysics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (6 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (2 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers), Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis (2 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (1 paper), Perovskite Materials and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (450 citations), Materials Chemistry (811 citations), Biomedical Engineering (336 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (408 citations) and Geophysics (74 citations). Jens Kreisel has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Bouvier, P. A. Thomas, Brahim Dkhil, Feres Benabdallah, Mario Maglione, Dean S. Keeble, Igor Kornev, Pierre‐Eymeric Janolin, J. M. Kiat and A. M. Glazer. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Applied Physics Letters, Physical Review B, Phase Transitions and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact