Jen‐Ping Hwang

23 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Jen‐Ping Hwang
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 61
  • Developmental Neuroscience 60
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 44
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 145
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 165
Replace Raphaël Gourévitch with:
Raphaël Gourévitch France
Chen-Hong Yang Taiwan
Julio Sanjuán Spain
Marie‐Chantal Bourdel France
Filip Rybakowski Poland
Kenneth Rando United States
M.-C. Bourdel France
William T. Trost United States
Susana Alberich Spain
Rodrigo Escalona United States
Jen‐Ping Hwang relative to Raphaël Gourévitch France Raphaël Gourévitch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Raphaël Gourévitch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jen‐Ping Hwang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jen‐Ping Hwang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen‐Ping Hwang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen‐Ping Hwang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jen‐Ping Hwang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen‐Ping Hwang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen‐Ping Hwang. The network helps show where Jen‐Ping Hwang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jen‐Ping Hwang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jen‐Ping Hwang Line = papers co-authored together Jen‐Ping Hwang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005223
2 200949
3 200941
4 200328
5 199727
6 200323
7 201823
8 200321
9 200118
10 199817
11 200516
12 200016
13 201316
14 200715
15 200412
16 199911
17 200311
18 199711
19 199811
20
Capgras' syndrome in a patient with vascular dementia: a case report.
19978

About Jen‐Ping Hwang

Jen‐Ping Hwang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (61 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (60 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (145 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (165 citations). Jen‐Ping Hwang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shih‐Jen Tsai, Chen-Hong Yang, Chen‐Jee Hong, Jiing‐Feng Lirng, Yamin Yang, Tien‐Wen Lee, Ying‐Jay Liou, Eugene Lin, Chia‐Fen Tsai and Ping‐Keung Yip. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Geriatrics and gerontology international and Rejuvenation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact