Jenna Marcus

484 citations
29 papers · 249 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 6
    • Cancer Risks and Factors 3
    • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 11

Jenna Marcus

25 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Jenna Marcus
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Reproductive Medicine 50
  • Internal Medicine 18
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Epidemiology 114
Replace Natasha Brasic with:
Natasha Brasic United States
Mohiedean Ghofrani United States
E Terzakis Greece
Federica Cianfrini Italy
Amudha Thangavelu United Kingdom
Giovanni Scambia Italy
Tobias Engler Germany
Gita Bhat Canada
Glen Lo Australia
Luis Rojas‐Espaillat United States
Jenna Marcus relative to Natasha Brasic United States Natasha Brasic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Natasha Brasic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jenna Marcus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenna Marcus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenna Marcus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenna Marcus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenna Marcus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenna Marcus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenna Marcus. The network helps show where Jenna Marcus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jenna Marcus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jenna Marcus Line = papers co-authored together Jenna Marcus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202044
2 201734
3 202129
4 201928
5 202019
6 202312
7 202311
8 20229
9 20218
10 20228
11 20237
12 20187
13 20207
14 20217
15 20183
16 20183
17 20233
18 20202
19 20182
20 20241

About Jenna Marcus

Jenna Marcus is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (11 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Reproductive Medicine (50 citations), Internal Medicine (18 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Epidemiology (114 citations). Jenna Marcus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mark H. Einstein, Lisa Flowers, Mark Schiffman, Brian Befano, Akiva P. Novetsky, Nicolas Wentzensen, Levi S. Downs, Tanja Pejović, Jason D. Wright and Lynda D. Roman. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, eLife, Oncogene and International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact