Jeffrey J. DeVido

854 citations
21 papers · 678 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey J. DeVido

17 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers

Jeffrey J. DeVido
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 276
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 190
  • Clinical Psychology 99
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
Replace Ning Olivia Zhao with:
Ning Olivia Zhao China
Kelsey E. Magee United States
Kendyl Schaefer United States
Isha Dhingra United States
James Stevenson United States
Maria Giuseppina Petruzzelli Italy
Françoise Magnin France
Antonia Marsden United Kingdom
Markku Koskenvuo Finland
C. J. Meijer Netherlands
Jeffrey J. DeVido relative to Ning Olivia Zhao China Ning Olivia Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Ning Olivia Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey J. DeVido

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey J. DeVido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey J. DeVido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey J. DeVido more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey J. DeVido

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey J. DeVido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey J. DeVido. The network helps show where Jeffrey J. DeVido may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey J. DeVido, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey J. DeVido Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey J. DeVido links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012148
2 2008139
3 200366
4 201559
5 201058
6 201250
7 200942
8 201537
9 201530
10 200823
11 201510
12 20204
13 20144
14 20143
15 20203
16 20201
17 20111
18 20250
19 20170
20 20210

About Jeffrey J. DeVido

Jeffrey J. DeVido is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (276 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (190 citations), Clinical Psychology (99 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations). Jeffrey J. DeVido has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger D. Weiss, Daniel S. Pine, Robert James Blair, Karina S. Blair, Marilla F. Geraci, Nick G. Hollon, Marcela C. Otero, Olivera J. Bogunovic, Bruce W. Smith and Pamela Ng. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health and Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact