Jeffrey Ding

510 citations
38 papers · 323 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey Ding

32 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Jeffrey Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Gender Studies 214
  • Emergency Medical Services 53
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 174
  • General Health Professions 67
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 60
Replace Tania K. Arora with:
Tania K. Arora United States
Amy R. Motomura United States
Nicole A. Phillips United States
Feng-Chou Cheng Taiwan
Jaya Agrawal United States
Tiffany Anderson United States
Julia R. Fielding United States
William A. Ross United States
Ling-Hsia Wang Taiwan
Ada C. Stefanescu Schmidt United States
Jeffrey Ding relative to Tania K. Arora United States Tania K. Arora's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Tania K. Arora · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Ding. The network helps show where Jeffrey Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey Ding Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201947
2 201945
3 201941
4 202123
5 202122
6 201119
7 202016
8 202016
9 202014
10 202011
11 20209
12 20217
13 20205
14 20215
15 20235
16 20215
17 20224
18 20224
19 20243
20 20213

About Jeffrey Ding

Jeffrey Ding is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Health, having authored 38 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (24 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (11 papers), Sex and Gender in Healthcare (8 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (7 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Social Media in Health Education (5 papers) and Dental Education, Practice, Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (214 citations), Emergency Medical Services (53 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (174 citations), General Health Professions (67 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (60 citations). Jeffrey Ding has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Faisal Khosa, Sabeena Jalal, Nizar Bhulani, Savvas Nicolaou, Ismail Tawakol Ali, Javed Butler, Sanjiv Chopra, Pina C. Sanelli, Muazzam Nasrullah and Arvind Vijayasarathi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Journal of Women s Health, JAMA Neurology and Cell Death and Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact