Jeff Mercer
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Neurology top 2%
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Neurological disorders and treatments
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 4
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 3
- Nerve injury and regeneration 1
-
- Neurological disorders and treatments 5
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- D. James Surmeier (6 shared papers)C. Savio Chan (6 shared papers)Tatiana Tkatch (4 shared papers)Jaime N. Guzmán (2 shared papers)Gloria E. Meredith (1 shared paper)Ema Ilijić (1 shared paper)Caroline Rick (1 shared paper)Ryuichi Shigemoto (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)Foot & Ankle International (1 paper)Nature Neuroscience (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Current Opinion in Neurobiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanItaly
In The Last Decade
Jeff Mercer
8 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Jeff Mercer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 974
- Neurology 620
- Neurology 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 209
- Sensory Systems 40
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Mercer. The network helps show where Jeff Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ‘Rejuvenation’ protects neurons in mouse models of Parkinson’s disease Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 689 |
| 2 | 2004 | 178 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 145 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 143 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 99 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 8 | You Can Teach Hitting | 1993 | 1 |
About Jeff Mercer
Jeff Mercer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (974 citations), Neurology (620 citations), Neurology (91 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations) and Sensory Systems (40 citations). Jeff Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include D. James Surmeier, C. Savio Chan, Tatiana Tkatch, Jaime N. Guzmán, Gloria E. Meredith, Ema Ilijić, Caroline Rick, Ryuichi Shigemoto, Salvador Hernández‐López and Nicolas Maurice. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Foot & Ankle International, Nature Neuroscience, Nature and Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.