Jeff Latimer

860 citations
5 papers · 526 · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Law top 0.5%
    • Criminal Justice and Penology
    • Legal and Social Justice Studies
    • Crime Patterns and Interventions
    • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Papers in

Jeff Latimer

4 papers receiving 431 citations

Jeff Latimer's Hit Papers

The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis 2005 · 413 citations
4130+7+14Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Jeff Latimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Law 327
  • Sociology and Political Science 202
  • Clinical Psychology 47
  • Safety Research 26
  • Health 11
Replace Nova Inkpen with:
Nova Inkpen Australia
David S. Tanenhaus United States
Michelle Inderbitzin United States
Barbara A. Sims United States
David L. Myers United States
Andrew Sanders United Kingdom
Michael G. Petrunik Canada
Daniel W. Van Ness Malta
Hayley M. D. Cleary United States
Edie Greene United States
Jeff Latimer relative to Nova Inkpen Australia Nova Inkpen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Nova Inkpen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Latimer. The network helps show where Jeff Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Jeff Latimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeff Latimer Line = papers co-authored together Jeff Latimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis
Hit paper breakdown →
2005413
2 200187
3 200519
4
THE EFFECTS OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROGRAMMING: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL RR2000-16e
20006
5 20061

About Jeff Latimer

Jeff Latimer is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 5 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Penology (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (327 citations), Sociology and Political Science (202 citations), Clinical Psychology (47 citations), Safety Research (26 citations) and Health (11 citations). Jeff Latimer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig Dowden. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, The Prison Journal, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America and Canadian Journal of Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact