Daniel W. Van Ness
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Law in Society and Culture
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child Abuse and Trauma
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 11
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 2
- Law 6
- Law in Society and Culture 4
- Evolving Legal Systems and Governance 1
- Co-authors
- Karen Heetderks Strong (7 shared papers)Stephen J. Farenga (1 shared paper)Gerry Johnstone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Criminal Law Forum (3 papers)Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought (1 paper)American journal of play (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)Routledge eBooks (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalta
In The Last Decade
Daniel W. Van Ness
17 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Law 106
- Clinical Psychology 150
- Sociology and Political Science 320
- Health 27
- Gender Studies 25
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Van Ness
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Van Ness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Van Ness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Van Ness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Van Ness
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Van Ness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Van Ness. The network helps show where Daniel W. Van Ness may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Van Ness, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 217 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 4 | Blocks, Bricks, and Planks: Relationships between Affordance and Visuo-Spatial Constructive Play Objects. | 2016 | 24 |
| 5 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 6 | Crime and its victims | 1986 | 20 |
| 7 | AN OVERVIEW OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AROUND THE WORLD | 2016 | 17 |
| 8 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 16 | Restorative Justice Policies & Programs | 2007 | 1 |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 0 |
About Daniel W. Van Ness
Daniel W. Van Ness is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law, Clinical Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Conservation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (2 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper) and Evolving Legal Systems and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (106 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (320 citations), Health (27 citations) and Gender Studies (25 citations). Daniel W. Van Ness has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Karen Heetderks Strong, Stephen J. Farenga and Gerry Johnstone. Their work appears in journals such as Criminal Law Forum, Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought, American journal of play, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Routledge eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.