Jee‐In Kim

1.1k citations
69 papers · 928 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jee‐In Kim

66 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

Jee‐In Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Human-Computer Interaction 133
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 213
  • Otorhinolaryngology 26
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 24
  • Applied Psychology 26
Replace Minghao Yang with:
Minghao Yang China
Marco Agus Qatar
Minjing Yu China
Shiyang Cheng United Kingdom
Juan Manuel Gálvez Spain
Kyung-Ah Sohn South Korea
Xavier Giró-i-Nieto Spain
Yingying Zhao China
Jee‐In Kim relative to Minghao Yang China Minghao Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Minghao Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jee‐In Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jee‐In Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jee‐In Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jee‐In Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jee‐In Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jee‐In Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jee‐In Kim. The network helps show where Jee‐In Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jee‐In Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jee‐In Kim Line = papers co-authored together Jee‐In Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005181
2 201278
3 201864
4 201949
5 201545
6 202138
7 201634
8 201732
9 200528
10 202327
11 202326
12 201819
13
Evaluation of Antimicrobial, Antithrombin, and Antioxidant Activity of Dioscorea batatas Decne
200919
14 200618
15 201818
16 201813
17 200912
18 201612
19 201612
20 200511

About Jee‐In Kim

Jee‐In Kim is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Networks and Communications and Molecular Biology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (18 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (12 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (11 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (6 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (133 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (213 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (26 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (24 citations) and Applied Psychology (26 citations). Jee‐In Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hyung Seok Kim, Seung‐Kyu Chung, Yang Na, Jun Lee, Jaehun Bang, Kang‐Young Choi, Je‐Yoel Cho, Suk‐Chul Bae, Xin‐Zi Chi and Mi‐Hye Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, Lecture notes in computer science, Nutrients, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and Antioxidants.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact