Jay W. Jackson

1.8k citations
29 papers · 1.3k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jay W. Jackson

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jay W. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Social Psychology 555
  • Sociology and Political Science 905
  • Gender Studies 169
  • Applied Psychology 70
  • Communication 79
Replace Rob Foels with:
Rob Foels United States
Grażyna Wieczorkowska Poland
Amy C. Lewis United States
Tricia S. Jones United States
Scott Eidelman United States
Judith B. White United States
Stephanie A. Goodwin United States
D. Conor Seyle United States
Mansur Lalljee United Kingdom
Fabio Lorenzi‐Cioldi Switzerland
Jay W. Jackson relative to Rob Foels United States Rob Foels's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rob Foels · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay W. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay W. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay W. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay W. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay W. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay W. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay W. Jackson. The network helps show where Jay W. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jay W. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay W. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Jay W. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999262
2 2002229
3
Realistic group conflict theory: a review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature
1993224
4 2001151
5 2002124
6 200561
7 199755
8 199438
9 199927
10 201121
11 200820
12 200318
13 200115
14 200214
15 200113
16 202011
17 201111
18 20229
19 19674
20 20153

About Jay W. Jackson

Jay W. Jackson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Gender Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (16 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers) and Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (555 citations), Sociology and Political Science (905 citations), Gender Studies (169 citations), Applied Psychology (70 citations) and Communication (79 citations). Jay W. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eliot R. Smith, Oliver C. S. Tzeng, Janice R. Kelly, Verlin B. Hinsz, Brenda L Lundy, Robert A. Haaf, Harm Maarsingh, Brad Gilbreath, Erenie Guirguis and Daniel A. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact