Jay Sexton
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Soil Science top 5%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 10
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 2
- Ecology 6
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 4
- Environmental and biological studies 3
- Co-authors
- Mark E. Harmon (10 shared papers)Becky G. Fasth (5 shared papers)Olga N. Krankina (1 shared paper)Ingrid Olmsted (1 shared paper)Dennis F. Whigham (1 shared paper)Timothy D. Schowalter (4 shared papers)Chen D. Hua (1 shared paper)Christopher William Woodall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (4 papers)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (4 papers)Journal of Economic Entomology (2 papers)Ecoscience (1 paper)New Forests (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jay Sexton
16 papers receiving 829 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Insect Science 512
- Soil Science 235
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 162
- Global and Planetary Change 123
- Ecology 113
Countries citing papers authored by Jay Sexton
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Sexton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Sexton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Sexton. The network helps show where Jay Sexton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jay Sexton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 191 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 157 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 90 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 84 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 76 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 64 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 23 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 3 |
About Jay Sexton
Jay Sexton is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Environmental Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers), Environmental and biological studies (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (2 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (1 paper), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (1 paper) and Forest ecology and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (512 citations), Soil Science (235 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (162 citations), Global and Planetary Change (123 citations) and Ecology (113 citations). Jay Sexton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Harmon, Becky G. Fasth, Olga N. Krankina, Ingrid Olmsted, Dennis F. Whigham, Timothy D. Schowalter, Chen D. Hua, Christopher William Woodall, Bruce A. Caldwell and Susan G. Stafford. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Economic Entomology, Ecoscience and New Forests.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.