Jane Kertis

423 citations
13 papers · 273 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Kertis

12 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Jane Kertis
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 129
  • Global and Planetary Change 223
  • Ecological Modeling 29
  • Ecology 126
  • Insect Science 36
Replace Claudia M. Regan with:
Claudia M. Regan United States
Joshua S. Halofsky United States
Alec M. Kretchun United States
Victor Danneyrolles Canada
William T. Flatley United States
Amarina Wuenschel United States
Jon Schatz Australia
Megan K. Creutzburg United States
Jo Ann Fites-Kaufman United States
Josephine MacHunter Australia
Jane Kertis relative to Claudia M. Regan United States Claudia M. Regan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14×
Claudia M. Regan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kertis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kertis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kertis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kertis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kertis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kertis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kertis. The network helps show where Jane Kertis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Kertis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Kertis Line = papers co-authored together Jane Kertis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199672
2 201469
3 201432
4 201823
5 199315
6 201313
7 198712
8 201410
9 20168
10
Chapter 3: Old growth, disturbance, forest succession, and management in the area of the Northwest Forest Plan
20188
11 20196
12 20115
13
Classification of oak vegetation in the Willamette Valley
20080

About Jane Kertis

Jane Kertis is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (129 citations), Global and Planetary Change (223 citations), Ecological Modeling (29 citations), Ecology (126 citations) and Insect Science (36 citations). Jane Kertis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frederick J. Swanson, John H. Cissel, Barbara Marks, David O. Wallin, Steven A. Acker, Mark A. Stern, Ryan D. Haugo, Ayn Shlisky, James K. Agee and Scott D. Bridgham. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Geophysical Research Letters, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Ecological Applications and Northwest Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact