Jay Schaffer

668 citations
13 papers · 484 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Schaffer

13 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Jay Schaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 108
  • Statistics and Probability 101
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 83
Replace Martha D. Petoskey with:
Martha D. Petoskey United States
Han Du United States
Jasmin Divers United States
Abdulaziz Elfessi United States
Gerko Vink Netherlands
Klaus D. Kubinger Austria
Taehoon Kang South Korea
David Afshartous United States
Erin D. Foster United States
Jos Dessens Netherlands
Jay Schaffer relative to Martha D. Petoskey United States Martha D. Petoskey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Martha D. Petoskey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Schaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Schaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Schaffer. The network helps show where Jay Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Schaffer Line = papers co-authored together Jay Schaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2017125
2
Bonferroni Adjustments in Tests for Regression Coefficients
2006118
3 201174
4 200761
5 201138
6 201131
7
Emotion-Focused Coping: A Primary Defense against Stress for People Living with Spinal Cord Injury
200815
8 202311
9 20174
10 20203
11 20062
12 20151
13 20181

About Jay Schaffer

Jay Schaffer is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Statistics and Probability, Epidemiology, Small Animals and Pharmacology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (4 papers), Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers), Diverse Scientific and Engineering Research (1 paper), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (1 paper) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (108 citations), Statistics and Probability (101 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (83 citations). Jay Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Myoung‐Jin Kim, Jamis J. Perrett, Daniel J. Mundfrom, Andrea Petróczi, Tamás Nepusz, R. Dawn Comstock, Gen Kanayama, Perikles Simon, Harrison G. Pope and Rolf Ulrich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy, Sports Medicine, Journal of rehabilitation and Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact