Journal of rehabilitation

779 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 779 papers published in Journal of rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of rehabilitation usually cover Safety Research (255 papers), Clinical Psychology (116 papers) and Social Psychology (80 papers) specifically the topics of Disability Education and Employment (239 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (64 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of rehabilitation are Ralph L. Piedmont, Marti L. Riemer-Reiss, Richard T. Roessler, Robbyn R. Wacker, Hanoch Livneh, Julie F. Smart, Hector W. H. Tsang, Malachy Bishop, David R. Strauser and Ross Crisp.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of rehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of rehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025