Jay Patel

1.5k citations
33 papers · 774 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Patel

29 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

Jay Patel
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Health Informatics 30
  • Genetics 183
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 323
  • Neurology 51
  • Neurology 66
Replace Luke Macyszyn with:
Luke Macyszyn United States
Kai Roman Laukamp Germany
Junlin Zhou China
Manoj Mannil Switzerland
Jiangfen Wu China
Houman Sotoudeh United States
Natale Quartuccio Italy
Yi Kyung Kim South Korea
Anahita Fathi Kazerooni United States
Jay Patel relative to Luke Macyszyn United States Luke Macyszyn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Luke Macyszyn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Patel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Patel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Patel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Patel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Patel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Patel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Patel. The network helps show where Jay Patel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay Patel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Patel Line = papers co-authored together Jay Patel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016221
2 2018121
3 201952
4 201844
5 202039
6 202039
7 201832
8 201230
9 202227
10 202024
11 201921
12 202218
13 202318
14 202015
15 201814
16 202211
17 201711
18 20218
19 20217
20 20195

About Jay Patel

Jay Patel is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Surgery, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (2 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (2 papers) and Digital Imaging in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (30 citations), Genetics (183 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (323 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Neurology (66 citations). Jay Patel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sasan Partovi, Pallavi Tiwari, Prateek Prasanna, Anant Madabhushi, Jayashree Kalpathy–Cramer, Ken Chang, Katharina Hoebel, Niha Beig, Andrew Beers and Vinay Varadan. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Neuro-Oncology, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact