Jay O'Brien

21 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Jay O'Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Anthropology 113
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68
  • Archeology 8
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 40
  • Sociology and Political Science 143
Replace A. M. Berrett with:
A. M. Berrett United Kingdom
Gregory H. Maddox United States
Isaria N. Kimambo United States
Rhoda H. Halperin United States
Stephen Baier United States
Richard E. Downs Germany
Neil Parsons Botswana
Christopher A. Conte United States
William L. Partridge United States
Pierre Bonté France
Jay O'Brien relative to A. M. Berrett United Kingdom A. M. Berrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
A. M. Berrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay O'Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay O'Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay O'Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay O'Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay O'Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay O'Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay O'Brien. The network helps show where Jay O'Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jay O'Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay O'Brien Line = papers co-authored together Jay O'Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989119
2 1995100
3 198532
4 199232
5 198629
6 198117
7 198815
8 198914
9 198313
10 199111
11 19864
12 19914
13 19934
14
The political economy of capitalist agriculture in the central rainlands of Sudan
19833
15 19873
16 19943
17 19973
18 19772
19 19832
20 19932

About Jay O'Brien

Jay O'Brien is a scholar working on Anthropology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, History and Development, having authored 23 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (15 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers), African Studies and Ethnography (4 papers), Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers), Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers) and African history and culture analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (113 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (68 citations), Archeology (8 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (40 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (143 citations). Jay O'Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sudan. Frequent co-authors include John Markakis, Katsuyoshi Fukui, Douglas H. Johnson, A. M. Berrett, Michael D. Hubbard, William Roseberry, David I. Kertzer, Tim Niblock, Francis Mading Deng and Donald L. Donham. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of African Historical Studies, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines, Review of African Political Economy, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and American Anthropologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact