Jay A. Kaiser

1.2k citations
22 papers · 917 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jay A. Kaiser

20 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers

Jay A. Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 586
  • Pharmacology 211
  • Surgery 343
  • Biomedical Engineering 114
  • Family Practice 4
Replace RD Fraser with:
RD Fraser Australia
Thomas F. Mehalic United States
Ronald J. Wisneski United States
Frank A. Malara Australia
Ken Y. Hsu United States
Stefano Dragoni Italy
JOSEPH F. SCHWEIGEL Canada
Osmar Avanzi Brazil
Ulf Thelander Sweden
Konrad Mahlfeld Germany
Jay A. Kaiser relative to RD Fraser Australia RD Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
RD Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay A. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay A. Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay A. Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay A. Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay A. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay A. Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay A. Kaiser. The network helps show where Jay A. Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay A. Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay A. Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Jay A. Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008156
2 2008152
3 1988108
4 199876
5 199074
6 200870
7 201352
8
Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain.
200847
9 197837
10 199135
11 199434
12 197926
13 198220
14 19889
15 19757
16
Interobserver agreement using computed tomography to assess radiographic fusion criteria with a unique titanium interbody device.
20155
17 19964
18 19992
19 19981
20 19971

About Jay A. Kaiser

Jay A. Kaiser is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering and Urology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers) and Osteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (586 citations), Pharmacology (211 citations), Surgery (343 citations), Biomedical Engineering (114 citations) and Family Practice (4 citations). Jay A. Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Herzog, Eugene J. Carragee, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie, John A. Carrino, Tor Devin Tosteson, Betsy A. Holland, Margaret R. Grove, Loretta H. Pearson and Arthur H. White. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Radiology, The Spine Journal, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact