Jay A. Kaiser

20 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Jay A. Kaiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 656
  • Pharmacology 461
  • Surgery 478
  • Biomedical Engineering 254
  • Cell Biology 33
Replace Thomas N. Bernard with:
Thomas N. Bernard United States
Thomas F. Mehalic United States
Ken Y. Hsu United States
RD Fraser Australia
J. Naresh Babu India
Ronald J. Wisneski United States
Robert Fernand United States
Stephan Tohtz Germany
Tomoaki Kitagawa Japan
Joong Won Ha South Korea
Jay A. Kaiser relative to Thomas N. Bernard United States Thomas N. Bernard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Thomas N. Bernard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay A. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay A. Kaiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay A. Kaiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay A. Kaiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay A. Kaiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay A. Kaiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay A. Kaiser. The network helps show where Jay A. Kaiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay A. Kaiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay A. Kaiser Line = papers co-authored together Jay A. Kaiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008142
2 2008141
3 198894
4 199870
5 199066
6 200863
7 201347
8
Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain.
200840
9 199134
10 199433
11 197832
12 197921
13 198218
14 19889
15 19757
16
Interobserver agreement using computed tomography to assess radiographic fusion criteria with a unique titanium interbody device.
20155
17 19964
18 19992
19 19981
20 19971

About Jay A. Kaiser

Jay A. Kaiser is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Pharmacology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (10 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (656 citations), Pharmacology (461 citations), Surgery (478 citations), Biomedical Engineering (254 citations) and Cell Biology (33 citations). Jay A. Kaiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Herzog, Betsy A. Holland, Tor D. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie, John A. Carrino, Eugene J. Carragee, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Margaret R. Grove, Emily Blood and Loretta Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography and The Spine Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact