Conor O’Neill

476 citations
22 papers · 322 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Conor O’Neill

21 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Conor O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Clinical Psychology 202
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 41
  • Philosophy 24
  • General Health Professions 41
  • Demography 17
Replace Jill Peay with:
Jill Peay United Kingdom
James Tapp United Kingdom
Nico E. Oud United Kingdom
Paulo Correia Ferrajão Portugal
Louis Ploton France
Jennifer Creese United Kingdom
Chris Hollister United States
Jorge Luis Tizón Spain
Henri Dorvil Canada
Charlotte Berendonk Canada
Conor O’Neill relative to Jill Peay United Kingdom Jill Peay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Jill Peay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Conor O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conor O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conor O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conor O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Conor O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Conor O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Conor O’Neill. The network helps show where Conor O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Conor O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Conor O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Conor O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201157
2 201443
3 200335
4 201132
5 200227
6 201318
7 198016
8 202013
9 201811
10 200811
11 200211
12 201810
13 20059
14 20117
15 19966
16 20065
17 20034
18 20042
19 20192
20 19802

About Conor O’Neill

Conor O’Neill is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Health, Marketing and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Mining and Resource Management (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper) and Romani and Gypsy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (202 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (41 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), General Health Professions (41 citations) and Demography (17 citations). Conor O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Harry G. Kennedy, Helen O’Neill, Alan Kelly, Mary Davoren, Mary Anne Fitzpatrick, Hamish Sinclair, Dearbhla M Duffy, Brendan D. Kelly, CHARLES EDWARD SMITH and Brenda J. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, BMC Psychiatry, Land Degradation and Development, International Psychogeriatrics and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact