Jan‐Peter Sperhake

36 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Jan‐Peter Sperhake
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Infectious Diseases 318
  • Internal Medicine 42
  • Neurology 151
  • Emergency Medicine 77
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 131
Replace Ann Sophie Schröder with:
Ann Sophie Schröder Germany
Carolin Edler Germany
Defne Saatci United Kingdom
Ritin Mohindra India
Fabian Heinrich Germany
Halil Yıldız Belgium
Eefje Jong Netherlands
Herbert Mushumba Germany
Giuseppe Di Martino Italy
Jun Yasuhara United States
Jan‐Peter Sperhake relative to Ann Sophie Schröder Germany Ann Sophie Schröder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ann Sophie Schröder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan‐Peter Sperhake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan‐Peter Sperhake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan‐Peter Sperhake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan‐Peter Sperhake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan‐Peter Sperhake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan‐Peter Sperhake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan‐Peter Sperhake. The network helps show where Jan‐Peter Sperhake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan‐Peter Sperhake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan‐Peter Sperhake Line = papers co-authored together Jan‐Peter Sperhake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020275
2 202168
3 200937
4 200425
5 202025
6 202319
7 202216
8 201416
9 202114
10 200814
11 202212
12 202010
13 20209
14 20197
15
[Postmortem bite injuries cause by a domestic cat].
20026
16 20086
17 20215
18 20005
19 20015
20
Die Todesbescheinigung im Krankenhaus - wie gut ist die Qualität
20165

About Jan‐Peter Sperhake

Jan‐Peter Sperhake is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Neurology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (9 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (9 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (318 citations), Internal Medicine (42 citations), Neurology (151 citations), Emergency Medicine (77 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (131 citations). Jan‐Peter Sperhake has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ann Sophie Schröder, Klaus Püschel, Carolin Edler, Herbert Mushumba, Axel Heinemann, Fabian Heinrich, Marc Lütgehetmann, Julia Schädler, Antonia Fitzek and K. Meißner. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Legal Medicine, Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin and Rechtsmedizin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact