Jan-Peter Lamke

796 citations
9 papers · 626 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jan-Peter Lamke

9 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Jan-Peter Lamke
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 246
  • Clinical Psychology 172
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 71
Replace Jana Zweerings with:
Jana Zweerings Germany
Miranda L. Campbell United States
Johann Kruschwitz Germany
Kara M. Lindström United States
Simona Graur United States
Fei Xin China
Yara Jo Toenders Australia
Hui Ai China
Philippe Jawinski Germany
Kathryn A. Moores Australia
Jan-Peter Lamke relative to Jana Zweerings Germany Jana Zweerings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×50×
Jana Zweerings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan-Peter Lamke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan-Peter Lamke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan-Peter Lamke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan-Peter Lamke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan-Peter Lamke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan-Peter Lamke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan-Peter Lamke. The network helps show where Jan-Peter Lamke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jan-Peter Lamke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan-Peter Lamke Line = papers co-authored together Jan-Peter Lamke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2014241
2 2013160
3 201368
4 201454
5 201434
6 201826
7 201523
8 201417
9
Phenomenal depth: A common phenomenological dimension in depression and depersonalization
20133

About Jan-Peter Lamke

Jan-Peter Lamke is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Media Technology and Philosophy, having authored 9 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (1 paper), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Clinical Psychology (172 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (95 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations). Jan-Peter Lamke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henrik Walter, Michael Gaebler, Judith Karina Daniels, Denise Dörfel, Susanne Erk, Ullrich Wagner, Michael Scheel, Thomas Fydrich, Stefan Hetzer and Felix Bießmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, NeuroImage, Biological Psychology, Journal of Consciousness Studies and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact