Janet Wright
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Safety Research top 10%
- Career Development and Diversity
Papers in
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 5
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 2
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1
-
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 5
- Co-authors
- Richard A. Wilson (6 shared papers)Jessie Fernandez (4 shared papers)Laura L. Finken (2 shared papers)Janis E. Jacobs (2 shared papers)Cristian F. Quispe (2 shared papers)Donald R. Brown (2 shared papers)James A. Kulik (2 shared papers)Nandakumar Madayiputhiya (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Educational Research Journal (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Microbiology (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)New Phytologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Janet Wright
12 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- General Psychology 41
- Safety Research 66
- Plant Science 218
- Cancer Research 73
- Cell Biology 77
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Wright. The network helps show where Janet Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Identification of lysine residues required for signal-induced ubiquitination and degradation of I kappa B-alpha in vivo. | 1996 | 115 |
| 2 | 2012 | 105 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 0 |
About Janet Wright
Janet Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Safety Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (41 citations), Safety Research (66 citations), Plant Science (218 citations), Cancer Research (73 citations) and Cell Biology (77 citations). Janet Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Wilson, Jessie Fernandez, Laura L. Finken, Janis E. Jacobs, Cristian F. Quispe, Donald R. Brown, James A. Kulik, Nandakumar Madayiputhiya, Ronald T. Hay and Dominique Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as American Educational Research Journal, PLoS ONE, Microbiology, Scientific Reports and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.