Janet Stifter

25 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Janet Stifter
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 192
  • Health Information Management 75
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Health Informatics 5
Replace Kim de Groot with:
Kim de Groot Netherlands
Grace Teresinha Marcon Dal Sasso Brazil
Annelle Tanner United States
Magda Cristina Queiroz Dell’Acqua Brazil
Ronald Piscotty United States
Patrícia Rezende do Prado Brazil
Sabrina da Costa Machado Duarte Brazil
Heng-Lien Lo Taiwan
Harlon França de Menezes Brazil
Vanessa Monteiro Mantovani Brazil
Janet Stifter relative to Kim de Groot Netherlands Kim de Groot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×50×
Kim de Groot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Stifter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Stifter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Stifter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Stifter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Stifter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Stifter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Stifter. The network helps show where Janet Stifter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Stifter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Stifter Line = papers co-authored together Janet Stifter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013148
2 201538
3 201527
4 201625
5 201422
6 201521
7 201519
8 201419
9 201515
10 201515
11 202013
12 201412
13 202012
14 201712
15 20179
16 19919
17 20208
18 20138
19 20178
20 20156

About Janet Stifter

Janet Stifter is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management, Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (8 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Health Education and Validation (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (192 citations), Health Information Management (75 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Janet Stifter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gail M. Keenan, Diana J. Wilkie, Yingwei Yao, Karen Dunn Lopez, Graciele Fernanda da Costa Linch, Sevinç Taştan, Dawn E McKinney, Alessandro Febretti, Andrew E. Johnson and Ashfaq Khokhar. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Nursing Research, Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact