Janet Stifter

25 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Janet Stifter
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 218
  • Health Information Management 156
  • Health Informatics 11
  • General Health Professions 170
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Alvin D. Jeffery with:
Alvin D. Jeffery United States
Daniela Couto Carvalho Barra Brazil
Émilie Hudson Canada
Norma M. Lang United States
Catrin Björvell Sweden
Ronald Piscotty United States
Mary Hook United States
Amanda J Moy United States
Grace Teresinha Marcon Dal Sasso Brazil
Jacalyn Buck United States
Janet Stifter relative to Alvin D. Jeffery United States Alvin D. Jeffery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Alvin D. Jeffery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Stifter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Stifter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Stifter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Stifter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Stifter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Stifter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Stifter. The network helps show where Janet Stifter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Stifter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Stifter Line = papers co-authored together Janet Stifter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013133
2 201535
3 201527
4 201422
5 201621
6 201520
7 201418
8 201518
9 201515
10 201515
11 202012
12 202011
13 201411
14 201710
15 19919
16 20178
17 20138
18 20178
19 20207
20 20156

About Janet Stifter

Janet Stifter is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (11 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (218 citations), Health Information Management (156 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Janet Stifter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gail M. Keenan, Diana J. Wilkie, Yingwei Yao, Karen Dunn Lopez, Graciele Fernanda da Costa Linch, Dawn McKinney, Sevinç Taştan, Andrew Johnson, Alessandro Febretti and Ashfaq Khokhar. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, Nursing Research, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Clinical Nurse Specialist and MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact