Janet Specht
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 17
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 11
- Co-authors
- Meridean Maas (16 shared papers)G. Hauser (8 shared papers)G. Schatz (8 shared papers)R. Löhken (8 shared papers)H. Rebel (8 shared papers)G.W. Schweimer (6 shared papers)Lisa Skemp Kelley (3 shared papers)Myonghwa Park (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics A (5 papers)Western Journal of Nursing Research (4 papers)Journal of Gerontological Nursing (3 papers)Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Nursing Administration Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Janet Specht
47 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Research and Theory 34
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 47
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 467
- Radiation 177
- General Health Professions 441
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Specht
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Specht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Specht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Specht. The network helps show where Janet Specht may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1972 | 152 | |
| 2 | 1969 | 143 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 132 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 35 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 33 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 17 |
About Janet Specht
Janet Specht is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Clinical Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (17 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (7 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (47 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (467 citations), Radiation (177 citations) and General Health Professions (441 citations). Janet Specht has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Meridean Maas, G. Hauser, G. Schatz, R. Löhken, H. Rebel, G.W. Schweimer, Lisa Skemp Kelley, Myonghwa Park, Kathleen C. Buckwalter and H. Klewe‐Nebenius. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Western Journal of Nursing Research, Journal of Gerontological Nursing, Physical Review Letters and Nursing Administration Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.