David Reed

129 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

David Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 160
  • General Health Professions 876
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 378
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 79
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 44
Replace George E. Miller with:
George E. Miller United States
David Richards United Kingdom
Diana Lee Hong Kong
Ian Rees Jones United Kingdom
Mike Thomas United Kingdom
Janet Specht United States
Linda J. Johnston Canada
H. M. Rosenberg United States
Rachel M. Werner United States
William C. Bailey United States
David Reed relative to George E. Miller United States George E. Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
George E. Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Reed. The network helps show where David Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Reed Line = papers co-authored together David Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981322
2 2014173
3 1981148
4 2004135
5 1997106
6 199392
7 200591
8 199084
9 200281
10 200278
11 201368
12 200064
13 197462
14 201457
15 201355
16 201351
17 201450
18 201550
19 200747
20 197944

About David Reed

David Reed is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Psychiatry and Mental health, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 132 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (26 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (15 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (10 papers), Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (8 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (160 citations), General Health Professions (876 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (378 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (79 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (44 citations). David Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Gert Ehrlich, Sheryl Zimmerman, Philip D. Sloane, Kathleen C. Buckwalter, Lauren W. Cohen, Brenda M. Booth, Karen M. Robinson, Meridean Maas, Anna Beeber and Daniel W. Russell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Surface Science, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Western Journal of Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact