Janet Scott

18 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Janet Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 58
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 137
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Emergency Medical Services 26
  • Hematology 43
Replace F.O. Dare with:
F.O. Dare Nigeria
Getnet Gedefaw Ethiopia
G Lévy France
Ed Mitchel United States
Michael O. Gardner United States
Sônia Bechara Coutinho Brazil
José Natal Figueroa Brazil
R C Pattinson South Africa
Kathleen O’Connor Canada
፟Addisu Getie Ethiopia
Janet Scott relative to F.O. Dare Nigeria F.O. Dare's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
F.O. Dare · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Scott. The network helps show where Janet Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Scott Line = papers co-authored together Janet Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2018111
2 201462
3 200946
4 201140
5 200635
6 198935
7 197323
8 200520
9 201717
10 201016
11 20186
12 19904
13 19904
14 20222
15 20192
16 20232
17
Introducing a freestanding emergency department.
20122
18
Saving babies' lives.
20091

About Janet Scott

Janet Scott is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (2 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (1 paper) and Disaster Response and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (58 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (137 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations), Emergency Medical Services (26 citations) and Hematology (43 citations). Janet Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jane Cioffi, Sonia Whyte, J. Frederik Frøen, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Alyson Hunter, Edile Murdoch, Sarah Cunningham‐Burley, Sarah J. Stock, Aryelly Rodríguez and Michael Geary. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Australian Critical Care, Journal of Medical Virology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact