Janet Malcolm
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Papers in
-
- American and British Literature Analysis 1
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 1
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 1
- History 2
- Photography and Visual Culture 2
- Journals
- Chicago Review (1 paper)The Antioch Review (2 papers)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (3 papers)Yale University Press eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Janet Malcolm
9 papers receiving 191 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- General Psychology 44
- Clinical Psychology 119
- Literature and Literary Theory 65
- Philosophy 48
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Malcolm
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Malcolm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Malcolm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Malcolm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Malcolm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Malcolm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Malcolm. The network helps show where Janet Malcolm may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Janet Malcolm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 90 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 75 | |
| 3 | In the Freud Archives | 1983 | 72 |
| 4 | The not returning part of it: "Wish I could be there: notes from a phobic life". | 2007 | 16 |
| 5 | Reading Chekhov: A Critical Journey | 2001 | 15 |
| 6 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 7 | The Purloined Clinic: Selected Writings | 1992 | 4 |
| 8 | Diana & Nikon: Essays on the Aesthetic of Photography | 1980 | 2 |
| 9 | Diana & Nikon : essays on photography | 1997 | 1 |
| 10 | En los archivos de Freud | 2004 | 1 |
| 11 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 12 | La mujer en silencio: Sylvia Plath & Ted Hughes | 2003 | 0 |
About Janet Malcolm
Janet Malcolm is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 12 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photography and Visual Culture (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Psychology and Mental Health (1 paper), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper) and Psychological Treatments and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (44 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (65 citations), Philosophy (48 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations). Frequent co-authors include Dianne F. Sadoff and Jon Saari. Their work appears in journals such as Chicago Review, The Antioch Review, Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja), Medical Entomology and Zoology and Yale University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.