Janet Lockman
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 4
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
- Co-authors
- Albert de la Chapelle (5 shared papers)Heather Hampel (4 shared papers)Wendy L. Frankel (3 shared papers)Kaisa Sotamaa (2 shared papers)Philip Kuebler (2 shared papers)Thomas W. Prior (2 shared papers)Edward W. Martin (2 shared papers)Jenny Panescu (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Janet Lockman
5 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Janet Lockman's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
- Cancer Research 503
- Oncology 861
- Genetics 180
- Surgery 163
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Lockman
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Lockman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Lockman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Lockman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Lockman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Lockman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Lockman. The network helps show where Janet Lockman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Lockman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Screening for the Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer) Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 978 |
| 2 | Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 624 |
| 3 | 2004 | 128 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 72 | |
| 5 | Allele separation facilitates interpretation of potential splicing alterations and genomic rearrangements. | 2002 | 20 |
About Janet Lockman
Janet Lockman is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research and Cell Biology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Cancer Research (503 citations), Oncology (861 citations), Genetics (180 citations) and Surgery (163 citations). Janet Lockman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert de la Chapelle, Heather Hampel, Wendy L. Frankel, Kaisa Sotamaa, Philip Kuebler, Thomas W. Prior, Edward W. Martin, Jenny Panescu, K. S. Khanduja and Dan Fix. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer Research, New England Journal of Medicine and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.