Janet Lees

873 citations
20 papers · 558 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Lees

20 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Janet Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 172
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 108
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 125
  • Parasitology 33
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 99
Replace Virginia Macdonald with:
Virginia Macdonald Australia
Özlem Özcan Türkiye
B. W. Richards Canada
Lin Cai China
Kate Palmer United States
Wolfgang G. Jilek Canada
Teresa Elliott United States
Saeid Hassanzadeh Iran
William Fraser United Kingdom
Maija Lindgren Finland
Janet Lees relative to Virginia Macdonald Australia Virginia Macdonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Virginia Macdonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Lees. The network helps show where Janet Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Janet Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Lees Line = papers co-authored together Janet Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2005114
2 200590
3 200172
4 199766
5 200560
6 201135
7 200822
8 199018
9 199215
10 200814
11
Children With Acquired Aphasias
199314
12 200112
13 20094
14 20124
15 19934
16 20124
17 20013
18 20013
19
Assessing the Influence of Religious Beliefs and Practices on Parenting Capacity: The Challenges for Social Work Practitioners
20102
20 19972

About Janet Lees

Janet Lees is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 558 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (6 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (172 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (108 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations), Parasitology (33 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (99 citations). Janet Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Julie A. Carter, Charles R. Newton, Brian Neville, Brian G.R. Neville, Jan Horwath, V. Mung’ala‐Odera, Amanda Ross, Gordon Grant, Elizabeth Croot and C.D. Binnie. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Aphasiology, Social Compass, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Nurse Education in Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact