Jane Wray

44 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Jane Wray
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Research and Theory 64
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Physiology 26
  • Safety Research 46
  • Emergency Medical Services 26
Replace Sharon L. Sims with:
Sharon L. Sims United States
Mairead Moloney Ireland
Carol Gordon Canada
Anna Majda Poland
Sirpa Janhonen Finland
Diane Willis United Kingdom
Dilek Akkuş Türkiye
Ayman Mohamed El‐Ashry Egypt
Wesam B. Darawsheh Jordan
Jeremy Dixon United Kingdom
Jane Wray relative to Sharon L. Sims United States Sharon L. Sims's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Sharon L. Sims · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Wray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Wray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Wray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Wray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Wray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Wray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Wray. The network helps show where Jane Wray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Wray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Wray Line = papers co-authored together Jane Wray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200743
2 200840
3 201237
4 201328
5 201127
6 201724
7 201220
8 201119
9 200718
10 202015
11
The PEdDS Project: Disabled Social Work Students and Placements
200513
12 201312
13 199611
14 200111
15 20199
16 20229
17 20209
18 19858
19 20077
20
Support for carers of people with learning disabilities.
19967

About Jane Wray

Jane Wray is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Education and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (64 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations), Physiology (26 citations), Safety Research (46 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (26 citations). Jane Wray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Barrett, Eric Gardiner, Bob Gates, Helen Gibson, Roger Watson, Peter Draper, Anne Stimpson, Helen L. Storr, Liz Walker and Catherine Vial. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Evidence-Based Nursing and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact