Jane Wray

596 citations
48 papers · 420 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nursing education and management 15
    • Retirement, Disability, and Employment 3
    • Evasion and Academic Success Factors 3

Jane Wray

44 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Jane Wray
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Research and Theory 130
  • Leadership and Management 42
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 16
  • Safety Research 58
  • Demography 36
Replace Laura Dempsey with:
Laura Dempsey Ireland
Lisbet Nyström Finland
Jessica Anne Viveka Hemberg Finland
Jan Maree Sayers Australia
Jennifer A. Kirton United Kingdom
Pamela Hagan United Kingdom
Marie Earvolino-Ramirez United States
Nadine Nehls United States
Julie Bradshaw Australia
Estelle E. Codier United States
Jane Wray relative to Laura Dempsey Ireland Laura Dempsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Laura Dempsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Wray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Wray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Wray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Wray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Wray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Wray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Wray. The network helps show where Jane Wray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Wray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Wray Line = papers co-authored together Jane Wray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200839
2 201237
3 201332
4 201326
5 201125
6 201724
7 201220
8 201119
9 200718
10 202017
11
The PEdDS Project: Disabled Social Work Students and Placements
200512
12 201312
13 200111
14 199610
15 202210
16 20199
17 20209
18
Support for carers of people with learning disabilities.
19967
19 20227
20 20076

About Jane Wray

Jane Wray is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Demography, Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 48 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (15 papers), Disability Education and Employment (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Evasion and Academic Success Factors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (130 citations), Leadership and Management (42 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (16 citations), Safety Research (58 citations) and Demography (36 citations). Jane Wray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David Barrett, Eric Gardiner, Bob Gates, Helen Mary Gibson, Roger Watson, Peter Draper, Anne Stimpson, Liz Walker, Robert Newell and Caroline White. Their work appears in journals such as Nurse Education Today, Nurse Education in Practice, Journal of research in nursing, Evidence-Based Nursing and Health & Social Care in the Community.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact