Jane Stephens

13 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Jane Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 190
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 88
  • Finance 51
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • General Health Professions 98
Replace Lena J. Lee with:
Lena J. Lee United States
Khulood Kayed Shattnawi Jordan
Chanpen Choprapawon Thailand
Harshal Ramesh Salve India
Hosihn Ryu South Korea
Mohammed A AlAteeq Saudi Arabia
Ruchi Juyal India
Carina Sjöberg Brixval Denmark
Lubna Abushaikha Jordan
Jane Stephens relative to Lena J. Lee United States Lena J. Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Lena J. Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stephens. The network helps show where Jane Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Jane Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007148
2 201483
3 201445
4 198619
5 198013
6 20119
7 20128
8 19867
9 20097
10 20105
11 19854
12 20133
13
Expanding the scope of paramedic practice in rural and remote isolated communities
20071
14 20250
15 19850

About Jane Stephens

Jane Stephens is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (190 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (88 citations), Finance (51 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations) and General Health Professions (98 citations). Jane Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Nepal and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Padam Simkhada, Edwin van Teijlingen, Sue Jenkins‐Marsh, Phillip Good, Russell Richard, Glyn Chapman, Geoffrey Beattie, Darwin Dorr, Sanjeev Sharma and Pramod Regmi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American Journal of Community Psychology, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact