Jane Smart
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Marine and fisheries research
Papers in
-
- Environmental Conservation and Management 3
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 3
- Co-authors
- Dan Laffoley (1 shared paper)Harvey Locke (1 shared paper)Kathy MacKinnon (1 shared paper)Trevor Sandwith (1 shared paper)Stephen Woodley (2 shared papers)Craig Hilton‐Taylor (2 shared papers)Thomas M. Brooks (2 shared papers)Simon N. Stuart (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biodiversity and Conservation (1 paper)PARKS (1 paper)Conservation and Society (1 paper)Biodiversity (1 paper)The New Scientist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandVenezuelaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Smart
9 papers receiving 162 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Ecological Modeling 44
- Global and Planetary Change 90
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
- Ecology 74
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 25
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Smart
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Smart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Smart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Smart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Smart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Smart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Smart. The network helps show where Jane Smart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Smart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 3 | Circle sentencing in New South Wales : a review and evaluation | 2003 | 17 |
| 4 | Biodiversity challenge : an agenda for conservation action in the UK | 1993 | 6 |
| 5 | A Guide to Habitat Creation | 1991 | 6 |
| 6 | The IUCN red list : 50 years of conservation = La lista roja de la UICN : 50 años de conservación | 2014 | 3 |
| 7 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 |
About Jane Smart
Jane Smart is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 175 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (44 citations), Global and Planetary Change (90 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations), Ecology (74 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (25 citations). Jane Smart has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Venezuela and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dan Laffoley, Harvey Locke, Kathy MacKinnon, Trevor Sandwith, Stephen Woodley, Craig Hilton‐Taylor, Thomas M. Brooks, Simon N. Stuart, Michael Hoffmann and Melanie Heath. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, PARKS, Conservation and Society, Biodiversity and The New Scientist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.