This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biodiversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biodiversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biodiversity more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biodiversity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biodiversity.
About Biodiversity
The 715 papers published in Biodiversity in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biodiversity usually cover Ecological Modeling (81 papers), Ecology (254 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (112 papers), Global and Planetary Change (156 papers) and Horticulture (7 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (82 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (81 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (74 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (72 papers), Plant and animal studies (53 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (33 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (28 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biodiversity are Ernest Small, Meredith Root‐Bernstein, Nigel Dudley, Sasha Alexander, James N. Mills, George Barron, Daniel H. Janzen, Samuel Packer, Vernon H. Heywood and Ernest Small.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.