Jane Shipley

1.0k citations
20 papers · 677 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Shipley

16 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

Jane Shipley
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 529
  • Pharmacology 248
  • Neurology 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 109
  • Physiology 77
Replace Farrokh Farrokhi with:
Farrokh Farrokhi United States
David Abejón Spain
Stefan Schu Germany
Lora L. Brown United States
Elias Veizi United States
Beth Ketcik United States
Matthew W. Doust United States
Charles Brooker Australia
Liong Liem Netherlands
Jean-Pierre Van Buyten Belgium
Jane Shipley relative to Farrokh Farrokhi United States Farrokh Farrokhi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Farrokh Farrokhi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Shipley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Shipley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Shipley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Shipley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Shipley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Shipley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Shipley. The network helps show where Jane Shipley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Shipley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Shipley Line = papers co-authored together Jane Shipley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2007218
2 2007111
3 2011105
4 201172
5 202036
6 201433
7 201332
8 201415
9 202214
10 200114
11 200813
12 20208
13 20182
14 20181
15 20181
16 20091
17 20071
18 19880
19
An approach to low back pain
20080
20 20150

About Jane Shipley

Jane Shipley is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Rehabilitation, Cell Biology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Treatment (15 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (1 paper), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (529 citations), Pharmacology (248 citations), Neurology (81 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (109 citations) and Physiology (77 citations). Jane Shipley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. North, Rod S Taylor, David H. Kidd, Jaimie M. Henderson, Robert M. Levy, Konstantin V. Slavin, Giancarlo Barolat, Brian Simpson, Krishna Kumar and John Hernandez. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Neurosurgery, Pain Medicine, Trials and Nursing Standard.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact