Jane Shears

466 citations
7 papers · 256 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Shears

7 papers receiving 241 citations

Jane Shears's Hit Papers

Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses 2020 · 217 citations
2170+2+4Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Jane Shears
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Public Administration 120
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • General Health Professions 127
  • General Social Sciences 9
  • Health 12
Replace Tian Cai with:
Tian Cai China
Kim Strom United Kingdom
Alessandro Sicora Italy
María Jesús Úriz Pemán Spain
Isadora R. Hare United States
Tonya M. Westbrook United States
Jadwiga Leigh United Kingdom
Anne Minahan United States
Suzie S. Weng United States
Terry Tse Fong Leung Hong Kong
Jane Shears relative to Tian Cai China Tian Cai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Tian Cai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Shears

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Shears's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Shears with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Shears more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Shears

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Shears. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Shears. The network helps show where Jane Shears may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jane Shears, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Shears Line = papers co-authored together Jane Shears links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses
Hit paper breakdown →
2020217
2 202111
3 201610
4 20228
5 20246
6
Empowering Mental Health Research: User Led Research into the Care Programme Approach
20043
7 20251

About Jane Shears

Jane Shears is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Safety Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (120 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations), General Social Sciences (9 citations) and Health (12 citations). Jane Shears has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Banks, María Jesús Úriz Pemán, Ana M. Sobočan, Ed de Jonge, Rory Truell, Merlinda Weinberg, Kim Strom, Tian Cai, Michelle Hei Yan Shum and Campbell Killick. Their work appears in journals such as International Social Work, Ethics and Social Welfare, The British Journal of Social Work, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental and Health Risk & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact