Jane Roscoe

19 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Jane Roscoe
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Communication 71
  • Gender Studies 59
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
  • Cancer Research 33
  • Molecular Biology 141
Replace Jessica Maddox with:
Jessica Maddox United States
Xiaoli Tian Hong Kong
Sumin Zhao United States
Andrea Mayr United Kingdom
Brett Johnson United States
Mónica Chadha United States
Jackie Harrison United Kingdom
Anna Poletti Hungary
Thuy Tran United States
Martin Harrison United Kingdom
Jane Roscoe relative to Jessica Maddox United States Jessica Maddox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jessica Maddox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Roscoe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Roscoe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Roscoe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Roscoe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Roscoe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Roscoe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Roscoe. The network helps show where Jane Roscoe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Roscoe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Roscoe Line = papers co-authored together Jane Roscoe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000166
2 200452
3 199549
4 200138
5 200435
6 20019
7
Documentary in New Zealand: An immigrant nation
19998
8 20177
9 20006
10 20195
11 20044
12
The Blair Witch Project: Mock-documentary Goes Mainstream
20003
13 20183
14
Man Bites Dog: Deconstructing the Documentary Look
19972
15 19912
16 20162
17
Women in / and Media Today
20021
18 19971
19
Shift work. Planning shift patterns.
19901
20 20011

About Jane Roscoe

Jane Roscoe is a scholar working on Communication, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (8 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (71 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Cancer Research (33 citations) and Molecular Biology (141 citations). Jane Roscoe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Fredric A. Gorin, Peter M. Cala, Nanna K. Jørgensen, Lee Anne McLean, Harriette Marshall, Kate Gleeson, Manu Hegde, Craig Hight, Annette Hill and John Corner. Their work appears in journals such as Continuum, Media International Australia, Media Culture & Society, The Communication Review and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact