Jane Rich
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes
-
- Climate Change and Health Impacts
Papers in
-
- Health, psychology, and well-being 5
- Employment and Welfare Studies 3
- Workplace Health and Well-being 3
-
- Disaster Management and Resilience 4
- Co-authors
- Brian Kelly (13 shared papers)Tonelle Handley (10 shared papers)Deborah Loxton (7 shared papers)Kate Davies (9 shared papers)Terry J. Lewin (4 shared papers)Catherine Chojenta (2 shared papers)David Perkins (7 shared papers)Kerry Inder (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)PLoS Currents (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 papers)Diabetic Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBangladeshUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Rich
38 papers receiving 671 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Health 63
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 103
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 30
- General Health Professions 120
- Clinical Psychology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Rich
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Rich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Rich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Rich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Rich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Rich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Rich. The network helps show where Jane Rich may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Rich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 10 |
About Jane Rich
Jane Rich is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change and Health Impacts (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (63 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (103 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations), General Health Professions (120 citations) and Clinical Psychology (102 citations). Jane Rich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Bangladesh and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian Kelly, Tonelle Handley, Deborah Loxton, Kate Davies, Terry J. Lewin, Catherine Chojenta, David Perkins, Kerry Inder, Anthony S. Kiem and Emma Austin. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, PLoS Currents, BMJ Open, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Diabetic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.