Jane Rafferty

1.0k citations
36 papers · 776 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Rafferty

33 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Jane Rafferty
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Health 74
  • General Health Professions 201
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 40
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 63
  • Clinical Psychology 106
Replace Patricia A. Kaufert with:
Patricia A. Kaufert Canada
Albino Claudio Bosio Italy
Huanzhong Liu China
Sara Göransson Sweden
Kenneth Nunn Australia
Jaquelyn L. Jahn United States
Henry Walton United Kingdom
Alice Simon United Kingdom
Simon Kelly Australia
Nina Santavirta Finland
Jane Rafferty relative to Patricia A. Kaufert Canada Patricia A. Kaufert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Patricia A. Kaufert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Rafferty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Rafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Rafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Rafferty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Rafferty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Rafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Rafferty. The network helps show where Jane Rafferty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Rafferty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Rafferty Line = papers co-authored together Jane Rafferty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995143
2 2011101
3 201086
4 201149
5 201348
6 200943
7 201736
8 201028
9 201725
10 201822
11 199619
12 200319
13 199519
14 202015
15 198815
16 199315
17 201013
18 198712
19 202211
20
The economics of hospital reimbursement.
19829

About Jane Rafferty

Jane Rafferty is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (74 citations), General Health Professions (201 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (40 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (63 citations) and Clinical Psychology (106 citations). Jane Rafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Catherine A. Heaney, Richard Price, James S. Jackson, Briana Mezuk, Mark Dallas, Cleopatra H. Caldwell, Thomas M. Reischl, D. Grahame Hardie, Fiona A. Ross and E. Hill De Loney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aging and Health, Age and Ageing, Obesity, Hematological Oncology and Journal of Marital and Family Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact