Jane Rafferty

1.0k citations
33 papers · 686 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Rafferty

31 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Jane Rafferty
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Health 81
  • General Health Professions 197
  • Pharmacy 35
  • Clinical Psychology 137
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 40
Replace Albino Claudio Bosio with:
Albino Claudio Bosio Italy
Patricia A. Kaufert Canada
Asia Sikora Kessler United States
Kenneth Nunn Australia
C. Erik Landhuis New Zealand
Tony Towell United Kingdom
Luis M. Rivera United States
Jaquelyn L. Jahn United States
Sara Göransson Sweden
Judith P. Swazey United States
Jane Rafferty relative to Albino Claudio Bosio Italy Albino Claudio Bosio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Albino Claudio Bosio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Rafferty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Rafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Rafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Rafferty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Rafferty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Rafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Rafferty. The network helps show where Jane Rafferty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Rafferty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Rafferty Line = papers co-authored together Jane Rafferty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995133
2 201192
3 201081
4 201348
5 201147
6 200941
7 201735
8 201724
9 201820
10 200317
11 202015
12 199315
13 199615
14 198813
15 201013
16 198711
17 202211
18
The economics of hospital reimbursement.
19829
19 20228
20 20216

About Jane Rafferty

Jane Rafferty is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (81 citations), General Health Professions (197 citations), Pharmacy (35 citations), Clinical Psychology (137 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (40 citations). Jane Rafferty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard Price, Catherine A. Heaney, James S. Jackson, Mark Dallas, Naoko Ikematsu, D. Grahame Hardie, Cleopatra H. Caldwell, Fiona A. Ross, Thomas M. Reischl and E. Hill De Loney. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aging and Health, Age and Ageing, Administration in Social Work, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact