Anna Green

1.5k citations
55 papers · 992 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Green

50 papers receiving 962 citations

Peers

Anna Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Clinical Psychology 181
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 211
  • Health 52
  • General Health Professions 138
Replace Barbara A. Elliott with:
Barbara A. Elliott United States
Michelle Lobchuk Canada
Veronica Parker United States
Patricia Berry United States
Jo Hockley United Kingdom
Gloria Juarez United States
María Arantzamendi Spain
Barbara K Haas United States
Lorna Butler Canada
Kirsten Auret Australia
Anna Green relative to Barbara A. Elliott United States Barbara A. Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Barbara A. Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Green. The network helps show where Anna Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Green Line = papers co-authored together Anna Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014138
2 2014134
3 201693
4 201280
5 201848
6 202047
7 199633
8 201829
9 201724
10 200022
11 201221
12 202020
13 201320
14 201819
15 201619
16 201419
17 201518
18 201417
19 201913
20 199513

About Anna Green

Anna Green is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 55 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations), Clinical Psychology (181 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (211 citations), Health (52 citations) and General Health Professions (138 citations). Anna Green has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia M. Davidson, Tim Luckett, Michelle DiGiacomo, Meera Agar, Jane Phillips, Claudia Virdun, Melanie Lovell, Sally C Inglis, Rebecca Disler and Phillip J. Newton. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, BMJ Open, BMC Health Services Research, Palliative & Supportive Care and Hand.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact