Jane Minton

21 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Jane Minton
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 43
  • Virology 62
  • Pharmacology 106
  • Emergency Medical Services 35
  • Infectious Diseases 79
Replace Danielle Osterholzer with:
Danielle Osterholzer United States
Frédéric Frippiat Belgium
A J France United Kingdom
Neena Bodasing United Kingdom
Philip W. Lam Canada
Emily A. Thorell United States
Filippo Trapani Italy
Andrea Parisini Italy
Zipporah Krishnasami United States
Ila Aggarwal United Kingdom
Jane Minton relative to Danielle Osterholzer United States Danielle Osterholzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Danielle Osterholzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Minton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Minton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Minton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Minton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Minton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Minton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Minton. The network helps show where Jane Minton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Minton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Minton Line = papers co-authored together Jane Minton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201783
2 201641
3 201838
4 201724
5 200821
6 201620
7 199620
8 201719
9 199817
10 201610
11 19989
12 20208
13 20087
14 20097
15 20157
16 20046
17 20013
18 20201
19 20071
20
Systematic review of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy
20171

About Jane Minton

Jane Minton is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology, Surgery and Emergency Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), HIV-related health complications and treatments (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and HIV Research and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 citations), Virology (62 citations), Pharmacology (106 citations), Emergency Medical Services (35 citations) and Infectious Diseases (79 citations). Jane Minton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include David Meads, Maureen Twiddy, Elizabeth Mitchell, Judy Wright, Carolyn Czoski‐Murray, Samantha J. Mason, Philip Stanley, Craig V. Comiter, Michael McDonald and Armando Vargas‐Palacios. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, International Journal of STD & AIDS, Antiviral Therapy, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Journal of NeuroVirology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact