Jane Millar

4.7k citations
144 papers · 3.1k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Millar

136 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Jane Millar
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Gender Studies 393
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 653
  • Electrochemistry 221
  • General Health Professions 691
  • Political Science and International Relations 689
Replace Donald M. Taylor with:
Donald M. Taylor Canada
Ian Taylor United Kingdom
D. T. Campbell United States
Heather J. Smith United States
Brian Bell United States
Edward Shorter Canada
Michael Hill United States
Martin Kohli Germany
James E. Côté Canada
Ian Parker United Kingdom
Jane Millar relative to Donald M. Taylor Canada Donald M. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22.1×
Donald M. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Millar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Millar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Millar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Millar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Millar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Millar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Millar. The network helps show where Jane Millar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Millar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Millar Line = papers co-authored together Jane Millar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Women and Poverty in Britain
1987123
2 1996117
3 1989113
4 199083
5 200883
6 199082
7 198079
8
Women and poverty in Britain, the 1990s
199278
9 200775
10 200274
11 199073
12 201672
13 199765
14 200761
15 200758
16 198358
17 198155
18 200651
19 200048
20 198147

About Jane Millar

Jane Millar is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Gender Studies, having authored 144 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (44 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (30 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (18 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (16 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (16 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (13 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (13 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (393 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (653 citations), Electrochemistry (221 citations), General Health Professions (691 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (689 citations). Jane Millar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Glendinning, Tess Ridge, M. Armstrong‐James, Zygmunt L. Kruk, John Salt, Anne Corden, Graham V. Williams, Kevin Fox, Fran Bennett and Jon Stamford. Their work appears in journals such as Social Policy and Society, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, Policy & Politics, Social Policy and Administration and Journal of Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact