Jane Maddock

35 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Jane Maddock
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 17
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 122
  • Clinical Psychology 92
  • Ecology 116
Replace Dominika Skolmowska with:
Dominika Skolmowska Poland
Rachel S. Bergmans United States
Sarah E. Cusick United States
Tatjana Buklijaš New Zealand
Thao Thi Thu Nguyen Japan
Susana Santiago Spain
Peng Xiong China
Efthimios Gotsis Greece
Lisa K. Akison Australia
Jane Maddock relative to Dominika Skolmowska Poland Dominika Skolmowska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.7×
Dominika Skolmowska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Maddock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Maddock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Maddock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Maddock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Maddock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Maddock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Maddock. The network helps show where Jane Maddock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Maddock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Maddock Line = papers co-authored together Jane Maddock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017142
2 202161
3 201857
4 201953
5 201346
6 201845
7 202038
8 202332
9 202230
10 201426
11 202225
12 202124
13
25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IN MID-LIFE
201323
14 199618
15 201816
16 201915
17 201812
18 202312
19 202211
20 201810

About Jane Maddock

Jane Maddock is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Physiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (7 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (122 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations) and Ecology (116 citations). Jane Maddock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Hardy, Elina Hyppönen, Chris Power, Andrew Wong, Praveetha Patalay, George B. Ploubidis, Diana Kuh, Marie‐Claude Geoffroy, Juan Castillo‐Fernandez and Alun D. Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, British Journal Of Nutrition, Clinical Epigenetics, BMC Medicine and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact