Jane M. Read

1.7k citations
27 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 6
    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services 5
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 3
    • Remote Sensing in Agriculture 5

Jane M. Read

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane M. Read
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Ecological Modeling 163
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 458
  • Forestry 85
  • Ecology 534
  • Global and Planetary Change 439
Replace Frédéric Achard with:
Frédéric Achard Italy
Mike Peel South Africa
Robert C. Ong Malaysia
Colin Barr United Kingdom
Stephen M. Turton Australia
Glen Reynolds United Kingdom
Hans Juergen Boehmer Germany
Margareta Ihse Sweden
Marc K. Steininger United States
Cyril Kormos United States
Jane M. Read relative to Frédéric Achard Italy Frédéric Achard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frédéric Achard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Read

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Read more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Read

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Read. The network helps show where Jane M. Read may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane M. Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane M. Read Line = papers co-authored together Jane M. Read links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998317
2 200299
3 200490
4 200380
5 200380
6 201672
7 201172
8 201070
9 200348
10 200748
11 201133
12 201627
13 201026
14 200326
15 200823
16 200623
17 200417
18 200217
19 20157
20 20186

About Jane M. Read

Jane M. Read is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (3 papers), Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (163 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (458 citations), Forestry (85 citations), Ecology (534 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (439 citations). Jane M. Read has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Costa Rica and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include David B. Clark, Deborah A. Clark, Nina Lam, Brenden E. McNeil, José M. V. Fragoso, Charles T. Driscoll, Jeffrey B. Luzar, Kirsten M. Silvius, Han Overman and Anthony R. Cummings. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Applications, BioScience, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Luso-Brazilian Review and Bird Conservation International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact