Jane Lonie
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults
Papers in
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 8
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 4
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
- Co-authors
- Klaus P. Ebmeier (8 shared papers)Kevin M. Tierney (5 shared papers)Ronan E. O’Carroll (5 shared papers)John M. Starr (2 shared papers)Lucie L. Herrmann (6 shared papers)Claire Donaghey (5 shared papers)Emma Terrière (3 shared papers)Claire E. Sexton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Neurobiology of Aging (1 paper)Neurochemical Research (1 paper)International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Lonie
13 papers receiving 516 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Psychiatry and Mental health 350
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 60
- Cognitive Neuroscience 202
- Neurology 50
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lonie
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lonie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lonie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lonie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lonie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lonie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lonie. The network helps show where Jane Lonie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lonie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 12 | Assessing testamentary capacity from the medical perspective | 2017 | 5 |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 |
About Jane Lonie
Jane Lonie is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (350 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (60 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (202 citations), Neurology (50 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations). Jane Lonie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus P. Ebmeier, Kevin M. Tierney, Ronan E. O’Carroll, John M. Starr, Lucie L. Herrmann, Claire Donaghey, Emma Terrière, Claire E. Sexton, Mark E. Bastin and Clare E. Mackay. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Neurobiology of Aging, Neurochemical Research and International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.