Jane Li

69 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jane Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 304
  • Human-Computer Interaction 75
  • Biophysics 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 195
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 150
Replace Randy S. D’Amico with:
Randy S. D’Amico United States
D. Scott Lind United States
Rupert Bourne United Kingdom
Yi Xie China
Bernard Gibaud France
Jill Keeffe Australia
Karl E. Misulis United States
Igor Pantić Serbia
Chris Barry Australia
Zhe Li China
Jane Li relative to Randy S. D’Amico United States Randy S. D’Amico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Randy S. D’Amico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Li. The network helps show where Jane Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Li Line = papers co-authored together Jane Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014195
2 2016166
3 2011136
4 2009128
5 2014115
6 2020110
7 2012105
8 201662
9 201837
10 200634
11 200831
12 202129
13 201428
14 201424
15 201324
16 202123
17 201723
18 201923
19 201720
20 200619

About Jane Li

Jane Li is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Human-Computer Interaction, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (10 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Persona Design and Applications (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (304 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (75 citations), Biophysics (70 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (150 citations). Jane Li has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ralph J. Mobbs, Leila Alem, ‪Surya Nepal‬, Scott B. Huffman, Prashanth J. Rao, Julian Jang‐Jaccard, Jérôme Lecoq, Hongkui Zeng, Mark J. Schnitzer and Marlien Varnfield. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, International Journal of Integrated Care, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and npj Digital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact