Jane Lee

58 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

Jane Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Clinical Psychology 154
  • Cancer Research 99
  • Infectious Diseases 104
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 116
Replace James Murray with:
James Murray United Kingdom
Michael J. Li United States
Rachel S. Lee United States
Amber Johnson United States
Jingyi Fan China
Brenda Baker United States
Juan García García Spain
Tara Berman United States
Helen Statham United Kingdom
Barry J. Evans Australia
Jane Lee relative to James Murray United Kingdom James Murray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Murray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lee. The network helps show where Jane Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Lee Line = papers co-authored together Jane Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012125
2
Radioiodinated 1-(5-iodo-5-deoxy-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole (iodoazomycin arabinoside: IAZA): a novel marker of tissue hypoxia.
1991111
3 200790
4 201964
5 201360
6 201748
7 201446
8 198937
9 201614
10 201814
11 201114
12 202113
13 201413
14 202111
15 202210
16 202310
17 202110
18 201310
19 201710
20 20179

About Jane Lee

Jane Lee is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 862 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (20 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (13 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (13 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (11 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (154 citations), Cancer Research (99 citations), Infectious Diseases (104 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (116 citations). Jane Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Guilamo‐Ramos, Roger F. Steinert, Gabriel Robles, Yuanjin Zhou, Katharine McCarthy, Sheri J. Y. Mizumori, Yong Sang Jo, J. D. Chapman, Leonard I. Wiebe and John R. Mercer. Their work appears in journals such as AIDS and Behavior, Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, Clinical Social Work Journal, Gerodontology and Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact