Jane L. Frederick

654 citations
18 papers · 508 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane L. Frederick

17 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

Jane L. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 298
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 212
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 111
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 22
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 22
Replace C.B. Coulam with:
C.B. Coulam United States
János Urbancsek Hungary
Ook Hwan Choi South Korea
Amma Kyei-Mensah United Kingdom
Tahereh Madani Iran
Jeremy V. Kredentser Canada
Chan Woo Park South Korea
Carsten Rasmussen Sweden
P Barbarino-Monnier France
Marianne J. ten Kate‐Booij Netherlands
Jane L. Frederick relative to C.B. Coulam United States C.B. Coulam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C.B. Coulam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane L. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane L. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane L. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane L. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane L. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane L. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane L. Frederick. The network helps show where Jane L. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane L. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane L. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Jane L. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1993110
2 198484
3 199460
4 199444
5 199438
6 201436
7 199532
8 199124
9 199521
10 198521
11 199110
12 20059
13 19956
14 19945
15 19954
16 19902
17 20052
18 20150

About Jane L. Frederick

Jane L. Frederick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (1 paper) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (298 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (212 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (111 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (22 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (22 citations). Jane L. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include José P. Balmaceda, Sergio C. Stone, Gere S. diZerega, Ricardo H. Asch, Takao Shimanuki, R.H. Asch, Luca Bernardini, Daniel Potter, E. Scott Sills and Xiang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey and Molecular Cytogenetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact