Jane L. Frederick

653 citations
18 papers · 538 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jane L. Frederick

17 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Jane L. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Reproductive Medicine 316
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 232
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 119
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 23
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 28
Replace Ook Hwan Choi with:
Ook Hwan Choi South Korea
Ioannis N. Bontis Greece
Qiong Xing China
Jeremy V. Kredentser Canada
Michael R. Drews United States
Melanie R. Freeman United States
Hwang Kwon South Korea
Carsten Rasmussen Sweden
S.‐T. Joseph Huang United States
J. D. Stanger Australia
Jane L. Frederick relative to Ook Hwan Choi South Korea Ook Hwan Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Ook Hwan Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane L. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane L. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane L. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane L. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane L. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane L. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane L. Frederick. The network helps show where Jane L. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane L. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane L. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Jane L. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1993117
2 198498
3 199463
4 199446
5 201438
6 199436
7 199534
8 199124
9 199523
10 198522
11 199110
12 20059
13 19945
14 19955
15 19954
16 20052
17 19902
18 20150

About Jane L. Frederick

Jane L. Frederick is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Genetics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (1 paper), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (1 paper) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (316 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (232 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (119 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (23 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (28 citations). Jane L. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include José P. Balmaceda, Sergio C. Stone, Gere S. diZerega, Takao Shimanuki, Ricardo Hector Asch, R.H. Asch, Luca Bernardini, Xiang Li, Daniel Potter and Eric Scott Sills. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Science and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact