Jane Key
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 3
- Global Maternal and Child Health 2
- Birth, Development, and Health 1
-
- Reproductive Health and Contraception 1
- Nutritional Studies and Diet 1
- Co-authors
- Tina Kold Jensen (6 shared papers)Nicky Best (5 shared papers)Niels Keiding (3 shared papers)Michael Joffe (3 shared papers)Alan R. Boobis (1 shared paper)Donald S. Davies (1 shared paper)Paul Elliott (1 shared paper)Susan Hodgson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Environmental Health Perspectives (2 papers)American Journal of Epidemiology (2 papers)Human Reproduction (1 paper)Cancer Causes & Control (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Jane Key
6 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Reproductive Medicine 78
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 94
- Gender Studies 37
- Oncology 97
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 100
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Key
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Key more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Key
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Key. The network helps show where Jane Key may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane Key, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 176 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 129 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 17 | |
| 5 | Nurse prescribing in New Zealand-the difference in levels of prescribing explained. | 2020 | 4 |
| 6 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 7 | Studying human fertility (letter). | 2004 | 1 |
About Jane Key
Jane Key is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Oncology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper), Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper) and Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (78 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (94 citations), Gender Studies (37 citations), Oncology (97 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (100 citations). Jane Key has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Tina Kold Jensen, Nicky Best, Niels Keiding, Michael Joffe, Alan R. Boobis, Donald S. Davies, Paul Elliott, Susan Hodgson, Thomas Scheike and Simon G. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives, American Journal of Epidemiology, Human Reproduction, Cancer Causes & Control and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.