Jane Hook

22 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Jane Hook's Hit Papers

Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial 2015 · 986 citations
9860+3+7Years since publication250500750

Peers

Jane Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Reproductive Medicine 905
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 210
  • Oncology 345
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 224
  • Surgery 289
Replace Emanuela Veras with:
Emanuela Veras United States
A Fanucchi Italy
Dongyan Cao China
Giorgio Giorda Italy
Michiyasu Kawai Japan
Henric Malmström Sweden
W. Schröder Germany
Annika Auranen Finland
Mario Valenzano Menada Italy
Jae Yun Song South Korea
Jane Hook relative to Emanuela Veras United States Emanuela Veras's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Emanuela Veras · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Hook. The network helps show where Jane Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Hook Line = papers co-authored together Jane Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2015986
2 2011164
3 200776
4 200872
5 201359
6 201141
7 201739
8 201422
9 202120
10 200819
11 201317
12 202017
13 201116
14 201913
15 201312
16 20123
17 20153
18 20143
19 20241
20 20251

About Jane Hook

Jane Hook is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and CAR-T cell therapy research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (905 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (210 citations), Oncology (345 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (224 citations) and Surgery (289 citations). Jane Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Perren, Selina Bannoo, Stephen Dobbs, Jonathan Herod, Tito Lopes, Matthew Nankivell, Gordon C. Jayson, Sean Kehoe, David Luesley and Sharadah Essapen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology and Cancer Treatment Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact