Jane Glover

27 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

Jane Glover
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 264
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 153
  • Business and International Management 36
  • Accounting 87
  • Strategy and Management 113
Replace J. Surujlal with:
J. Surujlal South Africa
Loek Nieuwenhuis Netherlands
Rafael Ravina-Ripoll Spain
Kazi Enamul Hoque Malaysia
Bruno Barbosa Sousa Portugal
Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo Mexico
Cheri A. Young United States
Nicolás Contreras-Barraza Chile
Gemma Lewis Australia
Sivapalan Achchuthan Sri Lanka
Jane Glover relative to J. Surujlal South Africa J. Surujlal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
J. Surujlal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Glover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Glover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Glover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Glover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Glover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Glover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Glover. The network helps show where Jane Glover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Glover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Glover Line = papers co-authored together Jane Glover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201387
2 202081
3 200967
4 201558
5 201453
6 202040
7 201439
8 202037
9 201235
10 202025
11 201323
12 201620
13 200320
14 201320
15 201020
16 201919
17 201614
18 201610
19 20154
20 20214

About Jane Glover

Jane Glover is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 28 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (5 papers), Rural development and sustainability (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Higher Education and Employability (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (264 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (153 citations), Business and International Management (36 citations), Accounting (87 citations) and Strategy and Management (113 citations). Jane Glover has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Daniels, Trish Reay, Andrew Rothwell, Ian Herbert, Grahame Boocock, Anne Touboulic, Julie Holland, Donald Hislop, Edward P. Chronicle and Alison Collins. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Management Education, Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Journal of Economic Studies and Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact